Picasso: Peace and Freedom at Tate Liverpool, review
by Richard Dorment
Telegraph.co.uk
Picasso’s post-war political activity is the subject of an intermittently gripping exhibition at Tate Liverpool entitled (apparently, without irony) “Peace and Freedom”. If you come out of it as confused as I was, it is because the show refuses to oversimplify a messy topic fraught with contradictions at every twist and turn.
What is certain is that Picasso was never an ideological Marxist. His naïve support of a monstrous ideology was motivated by genuine humanitarian concerns – he also contributed generously to much worthier causes, including the American civil rights movement.
Yet the fact remains that for 30 years the artist whose name is synonymous with freedom of expression placed his genius in the service of tyrants dedicated to its ruthless suppression.
The precise nature of Picasso’s political affiliations has always been a contentious issue. Some art historians have detected evidence of anarchist sympathies in the early work executed in Barcelona and Madrid. But his dealer, Daniel Henry Kahnweiler, was adamant that the young Picasso was “the most apolitical man I ever met”.
The second half of Picasso’s life, however, was largely shaped by the vagaries of European politics. His passionate support of the Republican cause during the Spanish civil war resulted in life-long exile from the country of his birth.
And yet for all his immersion in Left-wing politics, with one glaring exception (Guernica – the monumental canvas expressing his outrage at the Fascist bombing of the Basque village in 1937), Picasso was never conspicuously successful as a painter of political propaganda. That is because effective agitprop requires the simplification of complex issues. Picasso was a poet, not a politician. His is an art of allusion, symbol and metaphor.
Agree? Disagree?
See the whole review here: Picasso: Peace and Freedom at Tate Liverpool, review